This experiment is the same as the 100 games session that I had played against Snowie recently. I did consistently and unconditionally doubled after XG's opening with 62, 63, 64 and also slotting in it home board (whether hitting me or not), during the first few rolls. If you look at a few games, you'll see the pattern and I'd be glad to explaind this in more detail if anyone is interested. My results based on my errors rates (8.97 checker, 29.39 cube and 12.80 overall) were effective +56 vs. expected -140 (no longer surprising at all), similar to my previous results against XG and against Snowie (effective +96 vs. expected -118). There was an early 64 cube win in the fourth game but even if you exclude it, the results are mind boggling considering that I'm basically mocking at the so-called "cube skill"... During my experiment in January 2017, there was also a 64 cube win in fourth game and the graphs look eerily similar. Trust me, there is nothing fishy going on. Each set of dice rolls are consecutive and not the same in the two experiments. It got me scratching my head also but I won't resort to any conspiracy therories at this point and leave that to you all... These 100 games were played in two sittings (so to speak) and inside a 24 hour period, from Saturday night to Sunday evening. They were played in Iron Man Mode as in all my previous experiments. Even though only the points won/lost should matter, another one of the interesting similarities is that I won 37 to 63 games, as compared to 40 to 60 in my 2017 experiment against XGR++.